🛢️ Issue 14 — Erection-Phase Design Constraint

The platform sized by someone else’s crane

A crane vessel’s lift capability helped set the hull diameter of what its installer called the deepest spar ever installed.

EE&HL Newsletter · September 2026 · Issue 14 · Section 1 Free
Heerema's semi-submersible crane vessel Thialf, twin cranes raised, alongside the Perdido spar with its integrated topsides already in place, Gulf of Mexico
SSCV Thialf alongside the Perdido spar after the single-lift topsides installation, Gulf of Mexico, 2009.
Photo: BoH, Wikimedia Commons, licensed CC BY-SA 3.0. Resized and format-converted for the web.
← All Issues

The Project

118
feet
Hard-tank outer diameter
555
feet
Overall hull length
7,820
feet
Water depth at the spar
9,773
short tons
Single-lift topsides

Perdido spar, Alaminos Canyon Block 857, US Gulf of Mexico. Operator: Shell, with Chevron and BP. Spar and mooring EPC: Technip (hull fabricated at Pori, Finland). Topsides: Alliance Engineering (design), Kiewit Offshore Services, Ingleside (fabrication). Dry transport: Dockwise, Mighty Servant 1. Transport and installation: Heerema Marine Contractors — DCV Balder (hull and moorings), SSCV Thialf (topsides).

Shell’s Perdido spar floats in about 7,820 feet of water at Alaminos Canyon Block 857, in the far western Gulf of Mexico close to the maritime boundary with Mexico. Heerema Marine Contractors, which installed it, described it as the deepest spar ever installed. Its hard tank — the cylindrical upper hull that carries the topsides — has an outer diameter of 118 feet, a figure Shell’s project accounts present as a balance: small enough to allow Heerema’s SSCV Thialf to install the topsides offshore, yet large enough to provide the required buoyancy and to contain the platform’s liquid storage tanks.

That constraint entered the design early. Shell’s topsides lead has said the deck was designed in 2005 to match Thialf’s lifting capability, with the goal of installing the topsides in one piece and keeping them under about 10,000 tons, rather than the three modules a development of this size would otherwise have needed. The Shell paper on the spar and moorings describes the hull as designed to accept a single-lift topsides by limiting its diameter to 118 feet and placing storage tanks for diesel, methanol and other liquids inside the hull rather than on the deck. Heerema was named transport and installation contractor in spring 2006 — a step Shell’s own account describes as critical, because the spar and topsides had to be designed around the capacities of the available vessels.

The hull was built by Technip at Pori, Finland, and carried some 8,200 miles on Dockwise’s heavy transport vessel Mighty Servant 1 to Kiewit Offshore Services’ yard at Ingleside, Texas. After about a month and a half of outfitting there, it sailed on 8 August 2008 for a 150-mile wet tow, reaching the field two days later. Tugs opened plugs in the soft tank to bring the hull to an incline of roughly 15 degrees; ballast water pumped from Heerema’s DCV Balder through hoses then brought it upright, about three and a half days after operations began. Three mooring lines had been pre-installed and suspended from buoys; once they were connected, the spar was storm-safe on 18 August. The remaining six lines of the nine-line polyester taut mooring were installed by 29 August — just ahead of Hurricane Gustav.

The installation vessel had already shaped the hull’s geometry before the hull ever left the yard.

In March 2009, Thialf set the 9,773-short-ton integrated topsides in a single lift — at the time, the heaviest made in the US Gulf of Mexico. The topsides sailed from Ingleside on 8 March; the lift was completed on 13 March, and the living quarters followed three days later.

⚙️ Erection sequence — wet tow, upending, mooring and single-lift topsides, Alaminos Canyon Block 857

Three-phase erection sequence diagram: Phase 1, the 555-foot spar hull is wet-towed horizontally about 150 miles from Ingleside to Alaminos Canyon Block 857, 8 to 10 August 2008; Phase 2, soft-tank flooding and hard-tank ballasting with water supplied by DCV Balder bring the hull upright, storm-safe on three pre-installed mooring lines on 18 August and on all nine lines by 29 August; Phase 3, SSCV Thialf sets the 9,773-short-ton topsides in a single lift in March 2009 on a hard tank whose 118-foot outer diameter was limited to suit that lift

Diagram: Original — EE&HL Network 2026. Spar proportions drawn to one scale from published dimensions; water depth and vessel sizes not to scale. Figures are drawn from the sources listed below, not independently measured by EE&HL Network.

Two further choices read as commercial decisions carried in engineering form. The polyester-and-chain mooring was selected to place less vertical load on the floating structure than an all-steel system would — a permanent design choice with an installation-phase payoff, not an installation-only one. And the hurricane-season sequencing, planned according to published accounts with statistical weather data and probability estimates for weather contingencies, governed when the hull reached a defensible storm-safe condition rather than anything in the structure’s geometry.

Each constraint answers a different question. But all three — the crane’s lift envelope, the mooring material and the weather window — required the same thing: coordination between design, construction planning and the available offshore installation equipment, arranged years ahead of the campaign itself.

For the ballast-controlled upending in more detail, see the Perdido Spar case study.

💡 The Core Insight

The hard-tank diameter reads as a negotiated design boundary rather than a purely operational one: narrow enough for Thialf’s single-lift installation, wide enough for buoyancy and storage. The 2005 decision to design the topsides around Thialf’s lifting capability shows the installation vessel entering the permanent design basis years ahead of the offshore campaign. This is an editorial reading of published project accounts; no contract documents or vessel-selection records were among the sources reviewed.

The Pattern & The Question

Why a single named vessel’s lift envelope becomes a permanent design constraint — and the three questions to put on your own erection-phase risk register.

Sections 2 and 3 are delivered free by email. Subscribe below and they land in your inbox now.

Subscribe Free — Get the Full Issue →

Free. No card required. Unsubscribe any time.

Sources and further reading

Source labels describe provenance and relationship to the subject, not authority. A source is primary evidence of what its publisher stated, not independent confirmation that every statement is complete or correct. See the editorial methodology.

Marco Torri
Founder and Editor, EE&HL Network · Commercial intelligence for erection engineering & heavy lift